Sameeta Ng, Ng Zevina Chanu, L Roshan Singh, R. K. Lenin Singh


Background and Objectives:The aim of the present study was to find out the relationship between aggression and socio demographic profiles of the study sample.

Methods: The sample consists of 300 college students from Imphal East and West districts of Manipur of which 150 cases were males and the other 150 cases were females. Students within the age group of 18-29 years, graduate and above and who were will to give consent for participating in the study were selected through convenient sampling technique. Semi-structure Proforma was used for collecting the socio-demographic profiles of the participants and Buss Perry Aggression Questionnaire was used for measuring aggression.

Results: The finding of the study showed no significant difference between overall aggression and the socio demographic factors of the study samples. However, aggressive subscales like hostility were found significant difference with respect to age range (p-value = 0.026) and education (p-value = 0.000). Physical aggression was also found to have significant difference with gender (p-value = 0.015) indicating that male were more involved in physical aggression. The findings also showed that verbal aggression has significant difference with respect to residence (p-value = 0.024).

Conclusion: The present study concluded thataggressive subscales like hostility were found more prominent among younger age college going students. Physical aggression was involved more among male gender than their female counterpart. The study also concluded that youth inhabited in rural area were more involved of verbal aggression than the urban inhabitants.In spite of the limitations, the present findings of the study could be useful for management to lessen aggressive behavior among youths.


Youth, aggression, socio demographic factors

Full Text:



Little Oxford English Dictionary. 9thed. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2006. Youth. P. 816.

National Youth Policy. Definition of Youth. India; 2014. Available from: URL:www. Accessed on September 5, 2015.

Baron RA, Richardson DR. Human aggression. 2nded. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1994.

Oxford Dictionary of Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press Inc; 2006. P. 18.

Lagerspetz KM, Bjorkqvist K, Peltonen T. Is indirect aggression typical of females? Gender differences in aggressiveness in 11 to 12 years old children. Aggress Behav 1988 Jan; 14(6): 403-14.

Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies; 2009. [Last accessed on 2012 Mar 12]. The NSDUH Report: Violent Behaviors among Adolescent Females. Available from: .

Bowker JC, Ostrovl JM, Raja R. Relational and overt aggression in urban India. Int J Behav Dev. 2012;36:107–16.

Saini S, Singh J. Gender differences in relational aggression and psychosocial problems in romantic relationships among youths. J Indian AcadAppl Psychol. 2008;34:279–86.

Deb S, Modak S. Prevalence of violence against children in families in Tripura and its relationship with socio-economic factors. J Inj Violence Res. 2010;2:5–18. [PMC free article][PubMed]

Khatri P, Kupersmidt JB. Aggression, peer victimisation, and social relationships among Indian youth. Int J Behav Dev. 2003;27:87–95.

Khatri P. Aggression, peer victimization, and social relationships among rural Indian youth. DissAbstr Int. 1997;57:6652B.

Buss AH, Perry M. The aggression questionnaire. J PersSocPsychol 1992; 63(3):452-59.

Abdullah H, Adriana O, Nobaya A, Ghazali S. Aggressive and delinquent behavior among high risk youth in Malaysia Asian Social Science 2015 Jun;11(6):62-72.

Okon MO, Momoh SO, Imhonde HO, IdiakheusEo. Aggressive tendencies among undergraduates: The role of personal and family characteristics. Revista Espanola de Orientacion Psicopedagogia 2011;22(1):3-14.

Alami A, Shahghasemi Z, Ghochan ADM, Baratpour F. Students’ aggression and its relevance to personal, family and social factors. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2015 Dec;17(12):1-6.

Sawalkar SV. A comparative study on aggression and emotional intelligence among college students of rural and urban area. The International Journal of Indian Psychology 2015 Mar;2(2):13-18.

Ling MO. The relationship between family socioeconomic status and lifestyle among youth in Hong Kong. SS Student E-Journal 2013;2:135-68.


  • There are currently no refbacks.