Dr.K. Krishna Kumar, Dr.M. Sudheer Kumar, B. Umamahesh Rao


Understanding of the nature of aquifers and their properties to a great extent help in groundwater developmental
activities in an area. Systematic studies of the aquifer characters give better insight into the existing groundwater
regime. Aquifer studies can be used to have better well design to improve the yield. Pumping tests were conducted and the data obtained
are utilized to calculate aquifer parameters deploying different methods developed by various hydro geologists. Aquifer characteristics can
be determined only when the time drawdown and distance drawdown relationship is established by conducting certain pump tests. Main
objectives of pumping tests are to determine the well functions and aquifer characteristics. The hydraulic characters can be determined in a
particular area by conducting pumping tests. In Dindi River basin a total number of Four pumping tests were carried out at Venkatapur,
Machinepally, Raviched and and Mahadevpur villages. In order to determine transmissivity, storage co-efficient. The transmissivity (T)
values of the formations computed by using In Cooper-Jacob method transmissivity is varies from 3.7 square meters per day to 51.7 square
meters per day; and Storage Coefficient is varies from 1.738x10-12 per unit area to 3.386x10-12 per unit area. The estimated transmissivity in
thesis method varies from 3 square meters per day to 57 square meters per day; and Storage Coefficient is varies from 1x10-4 per unit area to
8.43 x10-7 per unit area. The aquifer here is sub artesian conditions with uncon􀃶ned conditions and potentiality at the medium depths. The
data revealed that in the there is good yield in the bore well that implies the fractures in the sub surface has been well developed in the sub


Pumping test, Aquifer parameters, Uncon

Full Text:



Shayaq Ali, et. Al., 2015. Characterization of aquifer system of different geological formations is based on pumping test data - a case of Nekemte area, Western Ethiopia, International Journal of Modern Chemistry and Applied Science, 2(4), pp 215-227.

Luis E. Rivera, et.al, 2014. Interpreting Pumping Test Data from Fractured Aquifers –The Dual Porosity Model, GeoConvention 2014: Focus

Tatej. J., et. al., 2005. Comparative Analysis of Single Well Aquifer Test Methods of the Mill Tailing Site of Brost Zirovski vrh, Slovanija, Materials and Geoenvironment, Vol.52., No.4, pp. 669-684.

Abhay M. Varade et. al., 2014. Efficacy of Kumarswamy method in determining Aquifer Parameters of Large-Diameter Dugwells in Deccan Trap Region, Nagpur District, Maharashtra, Journal of Ind. Geophysics Union, v.18, no.4, pp:461-468.

Hossam Abdel And Hoda Ali El Et. Al., 2009. Parameter Estimation of Pumping Test Data Using Genetic Algorithm, Thirteenth International Water Technology Conference, IWTC 13, Hurghada, Egypt.

Peter A. Fokker, et al., 2013. Numerical Modeling of Periodic Pumping Tests in Wells Penetrating A Heterogeneous Aquifer, American Journal Of Environmental Science, 9 (1): 1-13.

Amah E. A and Anam G. S., 2016. Determination of Aquifer Hydraulic Parameters from Pumping Test Data Analysis: A Case Study of Akpabuyo Coastal Plain Sand Aquifers, Cross River State, S-E Nigeria, IOSR Journal of Applied Geology and Geophysics, Volume 4, Issue 1 Ver. I, PP 01-08.

A.B. DESHPANDE, et.al., 2009. Determination of Aquifer Properties for A Confined Aquifer with Graphical Analysis in MS-Excel, International Journal of Agricultural Engineering, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 285-288.

Yaping Wei, et., al., 2017. Water Table Response to a Pumping Test in the Hinterland Core Area of the Taklimakan Desert, China, Tecnología Y Ciencias Del Agua, Vol. VIII, Num. 2, Pp. 151-158.

Poonam Dubey et. al., 2014. Aquifer Parameterization in an Alluvial Area:Varanasi District, Uttar Pradesh, India- A Case Study, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 3, Issue 1.

Matthew W. Becker and Eric Guiltinan, 2010. Cross-Hole Periodic Hydraulic Testing of Inter-Well Connectivity, Proceedings, Thirty-Fifth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Leonard I. Nwosu, et.al., 2013. Evaluation of Groundwater Potential from Pumping Test Analysis and Vertical Electrical Sounding Results: Case Study of Okigwe District of Imo State Nigeria,The Pacific Journal of Science and Technology,Volume 14, Number 1.

Alireza Nassimi and Zargham Mohammadi, 2016. Comparison of the Results of Pumping and Tracer Tests in a Karst Terrain. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, V. 78, No. 2, P. 110–118.

Dana Mawlood and Jwan Mustafa, 2016. Comparison between Neuman (1975) and Jacob (1946) application for analysing pumping test data of unconfined aquifer, Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering Vol.4 No.3.

G. Venkata Rao, et., al., 2015. Estimation of Aquifer Properties Using Pumping Tests: Case Study of Pydibhimavaram Industrial Area, Srikakulam, India, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Environmental and Ecological Engineering Vol:9, No:9.

Benjamin Sosi 2013. Hydraulic characterization of the Kabatini Aquifer, Upper Lake Nakuru Basin, Kenya rift, using geophysical and pumping test data, International Journal of Development and Sustainability, Volume 2, number 3, pp: 2093-2109.

S.A Raji, et.al., 2017. Using Aquifer test pro 2016 for estimating Groundwater hydraulic Parameter for Sustainable yield, International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) – Volume 48, Number 2.

T.A. Tizro, et.al., 2014. Comparative Study of Step Drawdown and Constant Discharge Tests to Determine the Aquifer Transmissivity: the Kangavar Aquifer Case Study, Iran, Journal of Water Resource and Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 3 Issus. 1, pp. 12-21.

Elhag A.B, 2015. New innovation method modified for analyzing aquifer test data of pumping and recovery tests, International Research Journal of Geology and Mining, Vol. 5(1) pp. 1-5.

Stefan J. Kollet, Vitaly A. Zlotnik, 2005. Influence of aquifer heterogeneity and return flow on pumping test data interpretation, Journal of Hydrology 300, pp. 267–285.


  • There are currently no refbacks.