ANALYSIS OF CESAREAN RATES WITH ROBSON'S CRITERIA

Dr. Shanthadevi Sambath, Dr. Niranjana Asokan

Abstract


OBJECTIVE: To analyse the cesarean rates with Robson criteria and assess the impact of various categories to overall
cesarean rate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective observational study over a 3 month period. Analysed using questionnaire.
RESULTS: Total deliveries in study period were 1552. 50.5% delivered by cesarean. 28.3% cesarean from group 5, 19.3% from group 1, 15.7%
from group 10 making these the largest contributor to the cesarean rates.
CONCLUSION: The increasing primary cesarean rates are to be targeted to reduce overall rates. Cesarean rates are increasing exponentially
world over which needs to be addressed to improve maternal and neonatal outcome and reduce associated morbidity.


Keywords


Cesarean section, robson criteria, previous LSCS, breech

Full Text:

PDF

References


Robson MS. Can we reduce the caesarean section rate? Best Pract Res ClinObstetGynaecol 2001. Feb;15(1):179-194 10.1053/beog.2000.0156

Medical audit using the Ten group classification system and its impact on the cesarean section rate.Scarella A, Chamy V, Sepulveda M, Belizan JM. Eur J ObstetGynecolReprodBiol, 2011; 154; 136-40

A review of cesarean sections using the ten group classification system (Robson classification) in Korle Bu Teaching Hopsital, Accra. Samba A, Mumuni K. GynecolObstet (Sunnyvale), 2016. Volume 6, Issue 6

Implementation of cesarean birth review using ten group Robson’s classification and its immediate effects on rates of cesarean at university hospital. Aguiar R, Gaspar J, Reis Z. International congress, Brazil, 2015. P21

Analysis of cesarean section rate - according to Robson’s 10 group classification. TahiraKazmi, SarvaSaiseema A, Sultana Khan. Oman Med J, 2012, Sep; 27(5); 415-417

Brennan DJ, Robson MS, Murphy M, O'Herlihy C. Comparative analysis of international caesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor. Am J ObstetGynecol 2009;201(308):e301-e308


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.