POOR SCHOOL PERFORMANCE AND AUDITORY EVOKED POTENTIAL- A REVIEW

Dr. Kaushal Kumar Alam, Dr. Y. Udayashankar

Abstract


. Poor school performance, defined as a lower than expected academic achievement for a given age, cognitive abilities, and schooling, is complex and multifactorial. Poor school performance can result in child with low self-esteem and can cause significant stress to the parents. It is essential that cause for the poor school performance to be identified and appropriate strategy or treatment plan to be started early so that child can perform with full potential. Disorders of the auditory system affect academic performance are well known. Unlike speech and other behavioral auditory processing tests, auditory evoked potential (AEP) can be recorded regardless of a child’s developmental age or language, motivation or attention level. AEP can provide numerical data that can demonstrate central auditory nervous system maturation and, therefore can function as a biomarker of poor academic performance. Present study focuses on the researches that are done on the auditory evoked potential in poor school performance till recently

Keywords


Poor school performance; Low self-esteem; Auditory evoked potential (AEP); Academic performance.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Varsh S Deafness in India. Indian J Otol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2018 Aug 22]; 73-6.

Picton TW, Hillyard SA, Krausz HI, Galambos R. Human auditory evoked potentials; evaluation of components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1974; 36(2): 179-90.

Stockard JJ, Pope-Stockard JE, Sharbrough FW. Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials in Neurology: Methodology, Interpretation and clinical application. In: Aminoff MJ, editor. Electrodiagnosis in clinical Neurology. 3rd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1992:503-536.

Tandon OP. Averaged Evoked Potentials-Clinical Applications of Short Latency Responses. Ind J Physiol Pharmacol 1998;42(2):172-188.

Sohmer H, Feinmesser M. Cochlear action potentials recorded from the external ear in man. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1967 June; 76(2):427-435.

Jerger S, Martin RC, Jerger J. Specific auditory perceptual dysfunction in a learning disabled child. Ear and Hear 1987; 8:78-86.

Cunningham J, Nicol T, Zecker SG et al. Neurobiologic responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems: deficits and strategies for improvement. Clin Neurophysiol 2001;112:785-767.

Greenblatt ER, Bar A, Zappulla RA. Learning disability assessed through audiologic and physiologic measures: A case study. J of Comm Disord.1983; 16:309-313.

Khaliq F, Alam KK, Vaney N et al. Sensory, cognitive and motor assessment of children with poor academic performance: an auditory evoked potential. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2010; 54 (3): 255-264.

Marosi E, Harmony T, Becker J. Brainstem evoked potentials in learning disabled children. Int J Neuosci. 1990; 50:233-242.

Picton TW, Hillyard SA, Krausz HI, Galambos R. Human auditory evoked potentials; evaluation of components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1974; 36(2): 179-90.

Vaughan HG, Ritter W. The sources of auditory evoked responses recorded from the human scalp. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1970; 28(4): 360-67.

Donchin E, Ritter W, McCallum WC. Cognitive psychology: the endogenous components of ERP. In: Callaway E, Tueting P, Koslow S, editors. Event- related Brain Potentials in Man. New York: Acaemic Press; 1978.p.349-441.

Sanfins MD, Borges LR, Ubiall T, Colella-Santos MF. Speech-evoked auditory brainstem response in the differential diagnosis of scholastic difficulties. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017; 83:112-6.

Rocha-Muniz CN, Befi-Lopes DM, Schochat E. Sensitivity, specificity and efficiency of speech-evoked BERA. Hear Res. 2014; 1: 5-22.

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.

Purdy SC, Kelly AS, Davies MG. Auditory brainstem response, middle latency response and late cortical evoked potentials in children with learning disabilities. J Am Acad Audiol. 2002; 13:367-382.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.