OBSERVATIONAL STUDY IN PAINFUL BREASTS- VALUE OF IMAGING

Anam ul Haq, Shazieya Akhtar, Dr. Sheema

Abstract


Breast pain is one of the most common breast symptoms, which leads
women to seek a physician consultation1. It may cause a high level of
concern in women for an underlying malignancy. The reported
incidence of breast cancer in patients presenting with breast pain is 0%
to 3.2% 2-6.


Keywords


Ultrasonography performed instead mammography

Full Text:

PDF

References


Monica Morrow. The evaluation of common breast problems.Am Fam Physician

;61:2371–8.

Leung J, Kornguth P, Botway M. Utility of targeted sonography in the evaluation of focal

breast pain. J Ultrasound Med 2002;21:521–6.

Tumyan L, Hoyt A, Bassett L. Negative predictive value of sonography and

mammography in patients with focal breast pain. Breast J 2005;11:333–7.

Lumachi F, Ermani M, Brandes AA, et al. Breast complaints and risk of breast cancer.

Poplulation-based study of 2,879 self-selected women and long-term follow-up.

Biomed Pharmacother 2002;56:88–92.

Duijm L, Guit G, Hendriks J, Zaat J, Mali W. Value of breast imaging in women with

painful breasts: observational follow up study. BMJ 1998;317:1492–5.

Preece P, Baum M, Mansel R, et al. Importance of mastalgia in operable breast cancer.

BMJ 1982;284:1299–300.

Thomas JM, Fitzharris BM, Redding WH, Williams JE, Trott PA, Powles TJ, et al.

Clinical examination, xeromammography, and fineneedle aspi ration cytology in

diagnosis of breast tumours. BMJ 1978;2:113941.

Hermansen C, Poulsen HS, Jensen J, Langfeldt B, Steenskov V,Frederiksen P, Jensen

OM. Diagnostic reliability of combined physical examination, mammography and fineneedle

puncture (“triple test”) in breast tumours: a prospective study. Cancer

:60;186671.

Andersson I, Aspegren K, Janzon L, Landberg T, Lindholm K, Linell F,et al.

Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmo mammographic

screening trial. BMJ 1988;297:9438.

Nystrom L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S, Lindgren A, Lindqvist M, Ryden S, et al.Breast cancer

screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomized trials. Lancet

;341:9738.

Nab HW, Voogd AC, Crommelin MA, Kluck HM, van de Heijden LH,Coebergh JWW.

Breast cancer in the southeast Netherlands, 19601989:trends in incidence and mortality.

Eur J Cancer 1993;29:15579.(Abstract.)

De Koning H, Boer R, Warmerdam PG, Beemsterboer PMM, van der Maas PJ.

Quantitative interpretation of age specific mortality reductions from the Swedish breast

cancer screening trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:121723.

Hayward RS, Steinberg EP, Ford DE, Roizen MF, Roach KW. Preventive care

guidelines. Ann Intern Med 1991;114:75883.

TilanusLinthorst MMA, Bartels CCM, Obdeijn AIM, KuenenBoumeester V, Klijn

JGM, Oudkerk M. The effectiveness of surveillance for women with a family history of

breast cancer; a retrospective study. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1995;139:4459.

Fracheboud J, De Koning HJ, Beemsterboer PMM, Boer R, Hendriks JHCL, Verbeek

ALM, et al. Nationwide breast cancer screening in the Netherlands: results of initial and

subsequent screening 19901995. Int J Cancer 1998;75:6948.

Role of Breast Ultrasound and Mammography in Evaluating Patients Presenting with

Focal Breast Pain in the Absence of a Palpable Lump Rebecca Leddy, MD,* Abid Irshad,

MD,* Emily Zerwas, MD,* Nicholas Mayes, MD,* Kent Armeson, MS,† Maham Abid,

BS,‡ Abbie Cluver, MD,* Amy Campbell, MD,* Susan Ackerman, MD,* and Madelene

Lewis, MD*6 Ultrasound and Mammography in Breast Pain

Warwick DJ, Smallwood JA, Guyer PB, Dewbury KC, Taylor I. Ultrasound

mammography in the management of breast cancer. Br J Surg 1988;75:2435.

Van Oord JC, van der Vliet AM, Thyn CJP, Mak B, Hoogeboom GJ. The value of

ultrasound mammography in palpable breast masses. Fortschr Rontgenstr 1991;155:636.

Jackson VP. The current role of ultrasonography in breast imaging. Radiol Clin North

Am 1995;33:116170.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.